"La filosofía es la ciencia que complica las cosas que todo el mundo sabe". Juan Benet.
divendres, 23 de novembre del 2012
Article sobre Karl Marx
http://suite101.net/article/karl-marx-y-su-critica-de-la-religion-a58974
En aquest primer link ens presenta la frase de Marx que diu : “Dios es creación del hombre.”, i Marta Sabaté és dedica a comentar la defensa del senyor Marx sobre aquesta teoria. D’aquesta manera exposa les raons que Marx va donar per dir que Déu és una creació humana.
The cave Allegory is an allegory used by Plato, narrated by Socrates.
Socrates describes people, which are living in a cave since their birth. Their legs are held in place and also the neck is fixed, so they can’t see anything but a wall.
On the wall they see shadows, reflecting what’s happening outside the cave. They can’t see the exit and don’t even know that it exists. What’s happening on the wall and the shadows they’re seeing are reality for them. They create sciences and try to find regularities in the way the shadows are moving and try to make prognoses.
Socrates describes people, which are living in a cave since their birth. Their legs are held in place and also the neck is fixed, so they can’t see anything but a wall.
On the wall they see shadows, reflecting what’s happening outside the cave. They can’t see the exit and don’t even know that it exists. What’s happening on the wall and the shadows they’re seeing are reality for them. They create sciences and try to find regularities in the way the shadows are moving and try to make prognoses.
But what would happen if someone comes to free one of these persons and
show her the exit of the cave? The light would hurt their eyes and he/she would
be very confused. The things the person could see now would be less real for
him/her than the shadows in the cave, because she used to see the shadows all
his/her life.
He/she would like to go back to the cave and wouldn’t believe anything he/she sees is real.
He/she would like to go back to the cave and wouldn’t believe anything he/she sees is real.
If you would lead the person out of the cave he/she would refuse to go
outside. He/she would be blended by the light of the sun and couldn’t see
anything.
But little by little he would get used to the new things, which actually are real. He/she would see the sun, and understand that he/she just saw shadows all his/her life.
After all of this he/she wouldn’t like to go back to the cave.
But little by little he would get used to the new things, which actually are real. He/she would see the sun, and understand that he/she just saw shadows all his/her life.
After all of this he/she wouldn’t like to go back to the cave.
If he/she would go back in the cave anyway, it would take him/her time to
get used to the darkness in the cave once again. For this reason he/she
wouldn’t be doing well in the Sciences of the cave for a while. The other
people in the cave would laugh about him/her, and think nothing good about the
things outside the cave. They even would try to kill the next one who’s coming,
to lead another person out of the cave.
Intepretation
Socrates
explains how we can understand this allegory. The cave is the world, the normal
environment of the humans. Going in the daylight means going to a world where
only things exists, which can be caught by the mind but not by the eyes.
It’s related to theory of ideas or forms from Plato. This theory says things we can see are only an objective reality. The things we see are only shadows of ideas which should be the real reality. These ideas are perfect and unchangeable.
But Socrates also says, he doesn’t know this for sure, it’s just an idea or a hope.
The philosopher may be a person from the cave, freed from the chains.
It’s related to theory of ideas or forms from Plato. This theory says things we can see are only an objective reality. The things we see are only shadows of ideas which should be the real reality. These ideas are perfect and unchangeable.
But Socrates also says, he doesn’t know this for sure, it’s just an idea or a hope.
The philosopher may be a person from the cave, freed from the chains.
dijous, 22 de novembre del 2012
dimecres, 21 de novembre del 2012
Blog de Filosofia
Aquest link és d'un blog que pretenen tractar la filosofia i, diferents temes relacionats amb aquesta, d'una manera que no s'allunya de la nostra vida quotidiana. Es consideren "idealistes" que volen mostrar una aparença de "aprenents de filòsosf" i parlen sobre com ells veuen el món, i com veuen i admiren diferents fets que passen dia a dia.
Power Point Racionalisme i Empirisme
Aquest és un Power point que parla sobre el coneixement, del seu l'origen i els límits segons dos punts de vista: un és l'empirisme, que es basa en que res és innat i tot ho aprenem mitjaçant els nostres sentits, és a dir, amb l'experiènica i; l'altre és el racionalisme, que es basa en que la seva font de coneixement és la raó i les coses innates.
Ludwig Feuerbach
En aquest segon
link ens comenta la mateixa teoria del altre link penjat anteriorment però
utilitzant com a títol la frase: “Dios no existe, afirman los ateos. La hipòtesis
de Dios debe ser rechazada. Esta idea, iniciada en Grecia, resurge con fuerza
en el siglo XIX y llega hasta la actualidad.” Amb aquesta frase notem que també
defensa l’altre teoria, però aquesta vegada primerament fa una explicació més
amplia, i seguidament ens exposa la opinió de Ludwig Feuerbach.
Karl Marx
El primer link que he penjat al blog ens presenta la idea de Marx que Déu ha estat una creació humana, hi en aquest link ens presenta la crítica de Marx dividida en tres parts.
• La primera ens parla de que la filosofía pot aportar més cosas al homa que no pas la religió, però és pregunta de que perquè l’home en la necesitat de crear-se a ell mateix crea a Déu.
• La segona critica que la culpa és de la alineació que l’estat burges va crear en els homes.
• La tercera critica l’imposició de la religió per part de la burgesia.
• La primera ens parla de que la filosofía pot aportar més cosas al homa que no pas la religió, però és pregunta de que perquè l’home en la necesitat de crear-se a ell mateix crea a Déu.
• La segona critica que la culpa és de la alineació que l’estat burges va crear en els homes.
• La tercera critica l’imposició de la religió per part de la burgesia.
Subscriure's a:
Comentaris (Atom)